Comments on: Joi Ito on Barriers of Innovation @ SIME 08 http://nicolaiwadstrom.com/blog/2008/11/12/joi-ito-on-barriers-of-innovation-sime-08/ A Swedish/European Entrepreneur in Silicon Valley Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:20:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Edward pypesname http://nicolaiwadstrom.com/blog/2008/11/12/joi-ito-on-barriers-of-innovation-sime-08/comment-page-1/#comment-2394 Edward pypesname Thu, 18 Dec 2008 13:54:12 +0000 http://www.wadstrom.net/?p=139#comment-2394 First of all congratulation for such a great site. I learned a lot reading article here today. I will make sure i visit this site once a day so i can learn more. First of all congratulation for such a great site. I learned a lot reading article here today. I will make sure i visit this site once a day so i can learn more.

]]> By: Sime - a large conference about digital communication - but the lost of electricity makes it difficult | Global Viking http://nicolaiwadstrom.com/blog/2008/11/12/joi-ito-on-barriers-of-innovation-sime-08/comment-page-1/#comment-1770 Sime - a large conference about digital communication - but the lost of electricity makes it difficult | Global Viking Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:49:50 +0000 http://www.wadstrom.net/?p=139#comment-1770 [...] Blogs in English and here is a post about Joi Ito, the CEO of Creative Commons, spoke about Barriers of Innovation and how the layers of [...] [...] Blogs in English and here is a post about Joi Ito, the CEO of Creative Commons, spoke about Barriers of Innovation and how the layers of [...]

]]> By: Joi Ito http://nicolaiwadstrom.com/blog/2008/11/12/joi-ito-on-barriers-of-innovation-sime-08/comment-page-1/#comment-1769 Joi Ito Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:09:11 +0000 http://www.wadstrom.net/?p=139#comment-1769 There are various different ways people like to define non-commercial, but the relevant clause in the <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/legalcode" rel="nofollow">Creative Commons Non-Commercial License</a> says: <blockquote>You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You in Section 3 above in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation. The exchange of the Work for other copyrighted works by means of digital file-sharing or otherwise shall not be considered to be intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation, provided there is no payment of any monetary compensation in connection with the exchange of copyrighted works.</blockquote> So in other words, someone posting on YouTube is non-commercial, but YouTube doing something themselves as a promotion would be commercial. We also believe that ads on a blog are "non-commercial" if the ads are primarily to pay for the hosting and the infrastructure. It's sort of paying a copy shop for the copies. There are various different ways people like to define non-commercial, but the relevant clause in the Creative Commons Non-Commercial License says:

You may not exercise any of the rights granted to You in Section 3 above in any manner that is primarily intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation. The exchange of the Work for other copyrighted works by means of digital file-sharing or otherwise shall not be considered to be intended for or directed toward commercial advantage or private monetary compensation, provided there is no payment of any monetary compensation in connection with the exchange of copyrighted works.

So in other words, someone posting on YouTube is non-commercial, but YouTube doing something themselves as a promotion would be commercial. We also believe that ads on a blog are “non-commercial” if the ads are primarily to pay for the hosting and the infrastructure. It’s sort of paying a copy shop for the copies.

]]>